And whereas yes, the ending is supposed to have a "Deus-Ex-Machina" feel to it, in the game it is much more thorough and more explained, in the movie you're just expected to roll with it. The sexual-tension seemed too forced (too many of those really slow "they're about to kiss but don't" moments).
The ONLY complaints I can think of are few, but here they are: A bit too much CGI, not on the stunts (not much CGI there surprisingly) but on things like demonic-esque snakes (you'll see). Is it as cheesy as that sounds? YES! Is it as awesome as that sounds? YES! But it's still well edited, well acted, well scored (Harry Gregson-Williams never fails), and overall well done enough to merit an enjoyable experience. So think 'Arabian Nights', Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves, Aladdin, all mixed with some Steve Reeves 'Hercules' and Robert E. The movie feels like your prototypical "sword and sandal" action flick, borrowing heavily from films like "The Thief of Baghdad", and stories found in "1001 Nights". The movie is stretched too thin, and it shows. Thats right! Based loosely on one game, borrowing elements from SIX more. Which is a rough retelling of the video game "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time", while incorporating elements of the following two sequels, as well as incorporating stylistic elements from the following game and the first three of the original trilogy. I'd say this movie is better than the sequels while not as good as the first. The first "Pirates" scored on average a 7.8 - 6.4 of 10, while the sequels averaged anywhere from 4.5 to 5.3. With that said, I'll lead into my thoughts on the film. It should be pointed out that this film is produced by the same company/studio that brought us 'Pirates of the Caribbean', and it certainly shows. The one thing no one can agree on is whether that's good or bad. If there's one thing critics can agree on, its that the movie is clichéd, borrowing elements from plenty of epics based in the Middle East and fantasy alike, and that it's loads of fun. Most reviews range anywhere from 8 out of 10, to as low as 2 or 3 out of 10. The average user ranking on MC puts it at 9 out of 10. scoring below 50% from Rotten Tomatoes, and MetaCritic, and notably a 2 out of 4 stars from Roger Ebert. The common view amongst "professional" reviews is that the movie is average.
0 kommentar(er)
